LLMs as Counterfactual Explanation Modules: Can ChatGPT Explain Black-box Text Classifiers?

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used for tasks beyond text generation, including complex tasks such as data labeling, information extraction, etc. With the recent surge in research efforts to comprehend the full extent of LLM capabilities, in this work, we investigate the role of LLMs as counterfactual explanation modules, to explain decisions of black-box text classifiers. Inspired by causal thinking, we propose a pipeline for using LLMs to generate post-hoc, model-agnostic counterfactual explanations in a principled way via (i) leveraging the textual understanding capabilities of the LLM to identify and extract latent features, and (ii) leveraging the perturbation and generation capabilities of the same LLM to generate a counterfactual explanation by perturbing input features derived from the extracted latent features. We evaluate three variants of our framework, with varying degrees of specificity, on a suite of state-of-the-art LLMs, including ChatGPT and LLaMA 2. We evaluate the effectiveness and quality of the generated counterfactual explanations, over a variety of text classification benchmarks. Our results show varied performance of these models in different settings, with a full two-step feature extraction based variant outperforming others in most cases. Our pipeline can be used in automated explanation systems, potentially reducing human effort

PEACE: Cross-Platform Hate Speech Detection- A Causality-guided Framework

Hate speech detection refers to the task of detecting hateful content that aims at denigrating an individual or a group based on their religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other characteristics. Due to the different policies of the platforms, different groups of people express hate in different ways. Furthermore, due to the lack of labeled data in some platforms it becomes challenging to build hate speech detection models. To this end, we revisit if we can learn a generalizable hate speech detection model for the cross platform setting, where we train the model on the data from one (source) platform and generalize the model across multiple (target) platforms. Existing generalization models rely on linguistic cues or auxiliary information, making them biased towards certain tags or certain kinds of words (e.g., abusive words) on the source platform and thus not applicable to the target platforms. Inspired by social and psychological theories, we endeavor to explore if there exist inherent causal cues that can be leveraged to learn generalizable representations for detecting hate speech across these distribution shifts. To this end, we propose a causality-guided framework, PEACE, that identifies and leverages two intrinsic causal cues omnipresent in hateful content: the overall sentiment and the aggression in the text. We conduct extensive experiments across multiple platforms (representing the distribution shift) showing if causal cues can help cross-platform generalization.Comment: ECML PKDD 202

Domain Generalization -- A Causal Perspective

Machine learning models rely on various assumptions to attain high accuracy. One of the preliminary assumptions of these models is the independent and identical distribution, which suggests that the train and test data are sampled from the same distribution. However, this assumption seldom holds in the real world due to distribution shifts. As a result models that rely on this assumption exhibit poor generalization capabilities. Over the recent years, dedicated efforts have been made to improve the generalization capabilities of these models collectively known as -- \textit{domain generalization methods}. The primary idea behind these methods is to identify stable features or mechanisms that remain invariant across the different distributions. Many generalization approaches employ causal theories to describe invariance since causality and invariance are inextricably intertwined. However, current surveys deal with the causality-aware domain generalization methods on a very high-level. Furthermore, we argue that it is possible to categorize the methods based on how causality is leveraged in that method and in which part of the model pipeline is it used. To this end, we categorize the causal domain generalization methods into three categories, namely, (i) Invariance via Causal Data Augmentation methods which are applied during the data pre-processing stage, (ii) Invariance via Causal representation learning methods that are utilized during the representation learning stage, and (iii) Invariance via Transferring Causal mechanisms methods that are applied during the classification stage of the pipeline. Furthermore, this survey includes in-depth insights into benchmark datasets and code repositories for domain generalization methods. We conclude the survey with insights and discussions on future directions